Sunday, October 31, 2010

Who is Frankenstein?

     As children, we all grew up with the idea of a green Frankenstein with bolts in its neck who was not all that smart. Before starting the book, I knew this would not be the Frankenstein I would encounter, but how truly different this character is surprised me.
     First, Frankenstein is actually the last name of the main character Victor. Victor created the creature we know to be "Frankenstein". Secondly, the creature is not green. I found how Victor put the creature together very interesting; putting different body parts together is a creative way to go about his project. This simply means the creature is just patched together, making it seem like he has scars everywhere. Possibly the most surprising fact is that the creature is actually really smart. He speaks fluently and has a developed thought process.
     This provides a substantial idea for the rest of the novel. Knowing that the creature is this smart and understands exactly what Victor thinks of him foreshadows how the novel will continue. From the content of their conversation, we know that Victor will not be kind to the creature, leading the creature to hurting Victor's "fellow yellow-creatures", therefore becoming "the author of your own speedy ruin."Obviously peace will never come to the characters, and the novel will continue as it has began as a sad, tragic story.

Taylor C.

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Favorite Frankenstein Quote

"If, instead of this remark, my father had taken the pains to explain to me that the principles of Agrippa had been entirely exploded, and that a modern system of science had been introduced, which possessed much greater powers than the ancient, because the powers of the latter were chimerical, while those of the former were real and practical; under such circumstances, I should certainly have thrown Agrippa aside, and have contented my imagination, warmed as it was, by returning with greater ardour to my former studies."
-Victor
Chapter 2
This quote caught my attention due to its extensive amount of voice. I could really hear Victor almost smart alleckally say this. Also, it includes figurative language. They include litotes, hyperbole, and metaphor. It is as if he is blaming his father for the reason why he became involved with the alchemical sciences, instead of "natural philosophy". Its structure also caughy my eye, since it extremly long. It is also essential to the plot because if he didn't start with Agrippa he would not have moved on to other alchemist philosophies.
-Sasan

Friday, October 15, 2010

"To Be of Use" Response Blog

As I read "To Be of Use", I appreciated the value of good honest work. There is always work to be done in the world and it is up to use to determine what is meaningful to us. We need to find what makes us happy in order to grow as humans.
As my high school experience comes closer to the end, I often find myself thinking about how I want "to be of use" in the world. I often loft between studying medicine and becoming a pediatrician, or studying engineering and  contributing to the advancing world around us. Who knows, maybe I'll end up studying something totally different.
From a young age I knew that I wanted to help people in some way. As a kid I wanted to be a police officer because I admired their bravery. I even considered being a firefighter. As I grew older I discovered a talent for understanding mathematics. I may decide to take advantage of this as I enter college and start to pursue a career.
For now, I have yet to decide what I want to do. All I know is that I want my future profession to be beneficial to others. I want to be remembered as someone who cares about others and is willing to work hard no matter what the task.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Blog Five: The End of Solitude Response

In William's Deresiewicz's article the "End of Solitude", Deresiewicz goes on to explain how today's society has been built upon the idea that being alone is unwanted and not comon as it used to be a generation ago.


This picture shows what is typical in today's society and now rather than our society progressing, we have regressed in a way that instead of becoming independent as individuals we have become dependent of others. Deresiewicz puts perspective to how we interact with one another and how we have evolved to always feeling like we must satisfy others before ourselves. Individuality is not valued and is not an ideal way to conduct one's self and this is what Deresiewicz finds astonishing in his observation of today's society. The "End of Solitude" gave me the realization that Deresiewicz's arguement is on point and that it isn't socially acceptable to be an individual.

-Anissa Rosales

Monday, October 4, 2010

Blog Four - Archetypes and Big Fish

We have devoted a lot of time to studying and recognizing archetypes these past few weeks in class.  The movie we watched in class, Big Fish, contains tons of archetypes, many of which are easily understood and recognizable.

The most common archetype in this film is, as the title suggests, a big fish.  A fish resembles divine creation and life, while the big size of it shows that it has an important role in this world.  As we view the film, we learn that Edward Bloom becomes the big fish he always sought after.  He had an important role in the world, greatly affecting those around him.  In certain parts of the film, bones are scattered across the ground, representing the mortality of humans and reminding us that we must continue pressing forward in the life cycle eventually going through that transition from mortality here on earth to immortality in the next life in heaven.  During the story of his death, we learn that he is dropped into a river and becomes the big fish.  Rivers represent heaven, a transition in the life cycle, and continuous life.  While he himself dies and passes on to heaven, his life continues as the river through his stories.  Edward Bloom lives on and his son carries on the intriguing stories and lessons of his life.

Not only are countless archetypal symbols such as the big fish, river, darkness, forest, and choosing between split roads depicted, but other aspects of archetypes are also evident in the film. We see examples of archetypal characters such as the hero and the soul mate. Edward Bloom takes on the role as an archetypal hero. In  all of his adventures he depicts himself as larger than life, from being the hero that saved his small town of Ashton from what they thought to be a monstrous giant, to successfully retrieving the top secret files in WWII.  He is always achieving things which many feel are extraordinary and quite implausible if not completely impossible.


Just as the archetypes of “Big Fish” supply so much more meaning to the film, which otherwise would have been a jumble of random entertaining stories, they can supply much more meaning to any other piece of literature they are in. With archetypes, we are able to look deeper and discover new meanings created with each new archetypal symbol or idea introduced.

- Chad L.

Monday, September 27, 2010

Blog Three-Texting Can Be Literature too?!

I'm curious to see how many people had trouble we our activity last week of translating "Ulysses" into texting language. I know I had trouble with it. I've never really use abbreviations in my text messages--I usually write complete sentences with proper grammar, proper spelling, and all. Maybe it is just my type-A personality. Regardless, translating "Ulysses" into such condensed symbols was difficult for me.

Mrs. Elliott mentioned that according to some scholars, text language was used in literature during the Victorian period. Though its use is quite different today, text language is becoming very influential on our society. Now when you walk through the C-building hallways, you hear people yell "OMG!" in response to a surprising story their friend told them. In other words, texting language truly is becoming a language. According to some, it is becoming "a new genre" (Yukiko Nishimura, UC Davis professor). But although text language may be creating a new language, it may be destroying the English language as well. So the question arises: "Would email and texting together destroy the power of written language and literature?" Although texting is far from literature, it remains written language. However, with the growth and expansion of technology, I believe that the common interest in reading and literature is disappearing. For me, the only time I am able to read a good piece of literature is in school. I have too many extracurriculars and I don't have much time on my hands. In other words, I can only read literature when I am forced to for a class. But for others who do have time to read, texting and computers and technology in general could be a distraction from reading Alice in Wonderland or another piece of literature. I believe that texting is creating a language and destroying one. While creating a new and unique language, it reflects our lifestyle as Americans--we want things done easy and we want them done quick. And with the rapid growth of technology, texting and email have taken over our lives. My parents don't recieve a newspaper anymore because they can read all of the articles online. The only letters we recieve to our house are invitations, magazine subscriptions, and all of the pamphlets random colleges from the Northeast send to me (not to mention, I get emails from them, too). I think that as technology continues to grow, we will see the return of texting as literature similar to how it was in the Victorian period.

-Shelby F.

Saturday, September 18, 2010

Blog Two: Realities in Alice in Wonderland

"I wonder if I've been changed in the night? Let me think: was I the same when I got up this morning? I almost think I can remember feeling a little different. But if I'm not the same, the next question is ‘Who in the world am I?’ Ah, that's the great puzzle!" (Chapter 2: The Pool of Tears)

    Though in this particular quote Alice was talking about her size, little did she know of the hidden reality this question posed. As the book Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland progresses, I discovered the theme of the book to be of Alice growing up, changing from her child-like state of mind to adult thinking, and understanding the confusion of this process. Many parts of the book lead to this idea, such as the continual growing and shrinking. These forceful transformations relate to the changes going on within her and prove a valuable point. For example, when Alice was small, she thought she was worthless. But at the height of three inches, she was able to use her reasoning skills to escape the giant dog. This proves that size isn’t everything; adapting to difficult situations means more in adult life than simply a person’s physical size.

         I also found the idea of the baby turning into a pig interesting. To me, turning into a decent adult is a major part of this transition, and the baby turning into the pig is a metaphor of it turning into a disagreeable person, proving to Alice the seriousness of this change in her life. This quote says it all:

“If it had grown up, it would have made a dreadfully ugly child; but it makes rather a handsome pig, I think.” (Chapter Six: Pig and Pepper)

         By the end of the book, Alice’s reasoning, logic, and personality is more mature compared to the beginning. The court trial reveals it all, for as major injustices were being placed, Alice grasped this concept and spoke her mind against it all. She was able to think for herself rather than abide to the rulings of the court. She also increasing shows composure in frustrating situations, revealing a huge amount of self-control. This book constantly hints at ideas relating to growing up and the struggle in finding yourself, and in the end, Alice realizes the difficult task she has ahead of her. 


-Taylor C.